M mayer123 初级会员 2006-07-01 #21 so we should study DMs from different angles, but not be restricted to RT, is that right?
yinghuang 高级会员 2006-07-01 #22 yes, u can say that again. These days, almost all the phd and MA students in Guangwai use the two theories to study whatever topics. But what's new?
yes, u can say that again. These days, almost all the phd and MA students in Guangwai use the two theories to study whatever topics. But what's new?
yinghuang 高级会员 2006-07-03 #23 Puzzled a lot. Almost all the research related to DM has different working definitions. How can they get a consensus, if each has its own way to do things? Maybe, that's the problem with all social sciences research.
Puzzled a lot. Almost all the research related to DM has different working definitions. How can they get a consensus, if each has its own way to do things? Maybe, that's the problem with all social sciences research.
xujiajin 管理员 Staff member 2006-07-03 #24 From the literature I've read, only a small portion (definitely not the predominant approach) of the DM research used RT and the Adaptation Theory.
From the literature I've read, only a small portion (definitely not the predominant approach) of the DM research used RT and the Adaptation Theory.
yinghuang 高级会员 2006-07-04 #25 Oh, yes. I agree with u. What I said is the present case with Guangwai.
Y yanerlydia 2008-06-07 #26 回复: Discourse marker revisited 对DMs感兴趣的人还真不少，可是真要研究这个，问题多多！想做一个关于大学英语课堂中DMs使用状况的调查，不知如何作？请高手指点！
xujiajin 管理员 Staff member 2009-10-17 #27 回复: Discourse marker revisited http://people.bu.edu/bfraser/
