Miracle, Charles. 1991. Discourse Markers in Mandarin Chinese. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Ohio State University.
Inside cover and table of contents下载
http://forum.corpus4u.org/upload/forum/2005112821143977.doc
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEDICATION ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii
VITA v
LSIT OF TABLES viii
CHAPTER PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION 1
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Related studies of Varieties of Chinese 6
3.0 Goals 8
NOTES 11
II. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND METHODOLOGY 12
1.0 Introduction 12
2.0 Discourse Marker C definition 13
3.0 Conversation analysis 15
4.0 Geis Mode of Speech Acts and Social Action 18
5.0 Discourse Structure―Schiffrin’s Model of Discourse Coherence 22
6.0 Methodology for Data Collection 27
NOTES 29
III. HAO: MARKING CLOSURE AND TRANSITION 30
1.0 Introduction 30
2.0 The Role of hao in Discourse 31
2.1 Commisive/Requestive Social Actions 32
2.2 Appreciation of Statements 41
2.3 Completion of Physical Actions 49
2.4 Turn-Internal Use of hao 51
3.0 Summary 55
NOTES 57
IV. CONTRASTIVE MARKERS: KESHI, DANSHI AND BUGUO 59
1.0 Introduction 59
2.0 Analysis 62
2.1 Turn-Internal danshi and keshi 62
2.2 Turn-Initial danshi and keshi 73
3.0 Summary 86
NOTES 88
V. NA(ME) AND CONTINUATION 89
1.0 Introduction 89
2.0 Prior treatments of na(me) 90
3.0 Analysis 92
3.1 Conditional Use of na(me) 93
3.2 Na(me) Marking the consequent 95
3.2.1 Cause and Result in the Idea Structure
96
3.2.2 Warrant and Inference in the Information State 98
3.2.3 Motive and Action in the Social Action Structure 100
3.3 Succession in Time Marked by na(me) 105
3.4 Topic-Related Talk 108
3.4.1 Topic Development 108
3.4.2 Topic Shift 110
3.4.3 Topic Return 111
3.5 Na(me) Marking New Topics 114
3.6 The Evincive Use of Na(me) 115
4.0 Summary 116
NOTES 119
VI. CONCLUSION 120
1.0 Summary of Findings 120
1.1 Discourse Use of hao 120
1.2 Discourse Use of danshi, keshi, and buguo 121
1.3 Discourse Use of na(me) 122
2.0 Pedagogical Implications 123
3.0 Theoretical Implications 128
3.1 Implications for the Study of Chinese Linguistics
128
3.2 Implications Regarding Geis Social Action Model
130
3.3 Implications Regarding Schiffrin’s Model of Discourse Coherence 132
NOTES 137
BIBLIOGRAPHY 138
**************
My comment:
.......
而最接近于这里讨论的话语标记研究当数美国学者Charles Miracle 1991年于俄亥俄州立大学所做的博士论文。Miracle（1991）借鉴了Schiffrin（1987）的话语标记分析方法并结合Michael Geis的以社会行动为基础的会话分析方法，描写了几个汉语词语“好，可是，但是，不过，那（么）”的功能和使用情况。Miracle使用的语料是在台北录制的学生宿舍、食堂、学生活动室等情境下16名大学生或研究生的自然会话，为了补充正式场合的话语，又收集了以社会问题为话题的大学课堂讨论和台湾广播话语。
Miracle（1991）的结论是“好、就是、可是、但是、不过、是啊、那么”等词语可以对话语的连贯性做出贡献。他按信息结构，意念结构等细分了这些话语标记的话语功能。但他的研究有一个明显的问题，即他在分析时针对转写文本的，而非原始的录音材料。这样他实际上主要是针对转写文本从而来推测话语标记在实际中的使用功能表现。另外，他的语料虽然反映了语言在社会活动中的实际运用，但他没有考虑不同的社会活动会怎么影响语言使用。.......
Inside cover and table of contents下载
http://forum.corpus4u.org/upload/forum/2005112821143977.doc
TABLE OF CONTENTS
DEDICATION ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii
VITA v
LSIT OF TABLES viii
CHAPTER PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION 1
1.0 Introduction 1
2.0 Related studies of Varieties of Chinese 6
3.0 Goals 8
NOTES 11
II. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK AND METHODOLOGY 12
1.0 Introduction 12
2.0 Discourse Marker C definition 13
3.0 Conversation analysis 15
4.0 Geis Mode of Speech Acts and Social Action 18
5.0 Discourse Structure―Schiffrin’s Model of Discourse Coherence 22
6.0 Methodology for Data Collection 27
NOTES 29
III. HAO: MARKING CLOSURE AND TRANSITION 30
1.0 Introduction 30
2.0 The Role of hao in Discourse 31
2.1 Commisive/Requestive Social Actions 32
2.2 Appreciation of Statements 41
2.3 Completion of Physical Actions 49
2.4 Turn-Internal Use of hao 51
3.0 Summary 55
NOTES 57
IV. CONTRASTIVE MARKERS: KESHI, DANSHI AND BUGUO 59
1.0 Introduction 59
2.0 Analysis 62
2.1 Turn-Internal danshi and keshi 62
2.2 Turn-Initial danshi and keshi 73
3.0 Summary 86
NOTES 88
V. NA(ME) AND CONTINUATION 89
1.0 Introduction 89
2.0 Prior treatments of na(me) 90
3.0 Analysis 92
3.1 Conditional Use of na(me) 93
3.2 Na(me) Marking the consequent 95
3.2.1 Cause and Result in the Idea Structure
96
3.2.2 Warrant and Inference in the Information State 98
3.2.3 Motive and Action in the Social Action Structure 100
3.3 Succession in Time Marked by na(me) 105
3.4 Topic-Related Talk 108
3.4.1 Topic Development 108
3.4.2 Topic Shift 110
3.4.3 Topic Return 111
3.5 Na(me) Marking New Topics 114
3.6 The Evincive Use of Na(me) 115
4.0 Summary 116
NOTES 119
VI. CONCLUSION 120
1.0 Summary of Findings 120
1.1 Discourse Use of hao 120
1.2 Discourse Use of danshi, keshi, and buguo 121
1.3 Discourse Use of na(me) 122
2.0 Pedagogical Implications 123
3.0 Theoretical Implications 128
3.1 Implications for the Study of Chinese Linguistics
128
3.2 Implications Regarding Geis Social Action Model
130
3.3 Implications Regarding Schiffrin’s Model of Discourse Coherence 132
NOTES 137
BIBLIOGRAPHY 138
**************
My comment:
.......
而最接近于这里讨论的话语标记研究当数美国学者Charles Miracle 1991年于俄亥俄州立大学所做的博士论文。Miracle（1991）借鉴了Schiffrin（1987）的话语标记分析方法并结合Michael Geis的以社会行动为基础的会话分析方法，描写了几个汉语词语“好，可是，但是，不过，那（么）”的功能和使用情况。Miracle使用的语料是在台北录制的学生宿舍、食堂、学生活动室等情境下16名大学生或研究生的自然会话，为了补充正式场合的话语，又收集了以社会问题为话题的大学课堂讨论和台湾广播话语。
Miracle（1991）的结论是“好、就是、可是、但是、不过、是啊、那么”等词语可以对话语的连贯性做出贡献。他按信息结构，意念结构等细分了这些话语标记的话语功能。但他的研究有一个明显的问题，即他在分析时针对转写文本的，而非原始的录音材料。这样他实际上主要是针对转写文本从而来推测话语标记在实际中的使用功能表现。另外，他的语料虽然反映了语言在社会活动中的实际运用，但他没有考虑不同的社会活动会怎么影响语言使用。.......
