欢迎讨论:有关chunks/formulaic sequences/...等的研究

有相关的博士论文或者教有深度的研究吗?
觉得方向有二:
一,学习者相关的产出与native speakers比较,如frequency, (pragmatic) functions, variety... But, so what?!!!
二,与二语习得结合,如factors influencing the acquisition/use of formulaic sequences...常进入到psycholinguistics了. 那么,将语料库调查结果与心理因素结合起来的话,很容易受挑战.

这方面的研究究竟可以往哪走?
 
回复: 欢迎讨论:有关chunks/formulaic sequences/...等的研究

I just went to this conference. Look at the conference program and see some recent work there:

http://www.uwm.edu/Dept/English/conferences/fsl/index.html

http://forum.corpus4u.org/showthread.php?t=2883

有相关的博士论文或者教有深度的研究吗?
觉得方向有二:
一,学习者相关的产出与native speakers比较,如frequency, (pragmatic) functions, variety... But, so what?!!!
二,与二语习得结合,如factors influencing the acquisition/use of formulaic sequences...常进入到psycholinguistics了. 那么,将语料库调查结果与心理因素结合起来的话,很容易受挑战.

这方面的研究究竟可以往哪走?
 
回覆: 欢迎讨论:有关chunks/formulaic sequences/...等的研究

Your question is truly intriguing. Regarding your second question, research on corpus linguistics can hardly be connected to the evidences from psycholinguistics. CL, after all, has only descriptive power rather than explicatory. Even so, I still hope to see the bridge of these two fields as a promising land for the future.
 
回复: 欢迎讨论:有关chunks/formulaic sequences/...等的研究

李文中写过这方面的一篇博士论文AN ANALYSIS OS THE LEXICAL WORDS WORDS COMBINATIONS IN THE COLLEGE LEARNER ENGLISH 但我没有找到,你可以试试。
 
Back
顶部