[推荐]FLOB and Frown: Links invalid now.

FLOB和 FROWN可以在线检索(见第1楼的贴子)了真是件好事。好像BROWN和LOB也有在线检索的网址吧,Richard,是不是啊?
 
I posted a link for online concordancing of Brown some time ago (at the site of the LDC online).
 
Here are a few links for searching corpora online, inlcuding well known monolingual corpora like Brown, LOB, and BNC sampler and also some parallel English-Chinese corpora.

English: http://www.edict.com.hk/concordance/WWWConcappE.htm

English: http://www.lextutor.ca/concordancers/concord_e.html

Parallel: http://www.edict.com.hk/concordance/paralleltexts/
 
They are available on the new ICAME CD which can be ordered at a link earlier in this posting.
 
回复:[推荐]FLOB and Frown

以下是引用 xiaoz2005-5-22 11:43:05 的发言:

If you have a copy of Xaira, you can also access FLOB by opening the coprus with your xaira Client using the following as the corpus name
http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/corplang/flob/flob.xcorpus

I have a copy of xaira 1.14.6.13, but when I tried to open the corpus using http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/corplang/flob/flob.xcorpus as the corpus name, the computer said

2005071217314691.jpg


Can you tell me what's wrong? Thanks.
 
This copy of indexed FLOB works only with Xaira 1.10-1.13. Version 1.14 requires re-indexing.
 
回复:[推荐]FLOB and Frown

以下是引用 tiger2005-7-4 17:20:43 的发言:
What I really want is the plain texts of the corpora.

Tiger,你的心情我们能理解,但是这些语料库都是copyrighted,所以我们只能告诉你
ICAME这张光盘的购买方法了。Sorry。
 
回复:[推荐]FLOB and Frown

以下是引用 xiaoz2005-7-12 21:53:34 的发言:
This copy of indexed FLOB works only with Xaira 1.10-1.13. Version 1.14 requires re-indexing.

Unfortunately, itt still does not work with Xaira 1.13.
 
回复:[推荐]FLOB and Frown

请教:在网上检索FLOB和Frown得到的结果能进行进一步加工吗,比如查看MI值、把结果按字母顺序进一步整理等。
 
Mr. Xiao. I want to use xaira to explore Flob in order to get more information about the collocation of the searched word. but the website you provided (http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/corplang/flob/flob.xcorpus) is invalid now. Any new address available? Thank you!
 
That was only an experiment. Sory the service stopped for security reasons.
 
what a pity. thank you! Do you think it is feasible to use LCMC and BNC as comparable corpora. Despite their difference in size, they are both balanced corpora. I want to use the corpora to study function words.
 
If you have a copy of the BNC, you might compare LCMC with the WRITTEN part of the BNC Sampler, the filenames of which include:

Informative texts:
A7V
A87
A8J
A8W
A95
A9E
A9M
A9V
AA4
AAB
AAK
AAT
AP6
APJ
B2E
BMJ
BP6
C9C
CAA
CBB
CDH
CEL
CF5
CF6
CF7
CF8
CF9
CHP
CL8
CN4
EAP
EBK
EVR
EVY
EW4
EX7
F98
FA4
FB4
FCF
FEJ
FR2
FU0
FU7
FU9
G0C
G0K
G22
G2R
G3N
GT9
GUB
GV1
GX0
GX4
H0H
H0S
H13
H7C
H8W
HXN
HY1
J1L
J1N
J24
J2H
J2J
J55
J6W
JXL

Imaginative texts:
AEA
ALS
CCD
CHR
F9M
FRY
FSB
FU6
G0A
G11
G1V
GUL
GV9
GW5
GWA
J2G

The BNC Sampler corpus is balanced for genres. But normalisation is necessary when comparing corpora of different sizes.
 
我是一初学者,请教一个问题:Frequency per 10K words中的10k是什么意思?谢谢
 
Back
顶部