搜寻结果

I have to analyze the verbal error tags in a few days, but i don't have the explanations of the meanings of vp1 to vp9. please send me one to: tess@ms21.url.com.tw or post one on this board. many thanks.....

回覆: Learner corpus bibliography The learner corpora in Europe are generally composed of L2 data from many language backgrounds, ie. different countries.

回覆: 请教 no, you cannot. Every single PC is authorized for one spcific code.

回覆: 有要WordSmith Tools 4的请举手！ Can I pay in NTD?

People here in Taiwan do not use PinYin. When we need to translate our Chinese names into English, there is one system called "natural pinyin", which is different from PinYin in some ways. For example: 志 is 『Tz』 in 自然拼音, but 『Zhi』in hZ拼音。Generally, most people can only use 注音符，only those who are...

大家pattern grammar的看法如何呢？

我自己翻成『T用Z』，不知大家X得如何？

要翻gphraseology@~，恐怕得先^分出他和其他~的同，如collocation, multi-word-units, prefabricated items....等等

I also like to know the details of this project, please contact me at: tess@ms21.url.com.tw

i also have another question: can you guys read traditional Chinese? (it is only curiosity but no offense) We those Big5 users are able to read some simplified Chinese, but not all, most of the case we have to guess...Is this alo happen to you as a GB user?

[原创]为何大陆的corpus linguistics如此蓬勃发展？ It really surprised me that so many people devoted themselves to Corpus Linguistics in Mainland China. The situation here in Taiwan is totally reversed...only a few scholars have the knowledge and skills in doing corpus-based studies. As a result, the...

我相同意jackzch的f法。的_每研究工作都不可能完全]有}，事上只是接近真理距x的h近不同而已。氖Wg研究不正是一l不嘣阱e`中追ふ胬淼穆幔 可是我X得CLEC在十分可惜，因槌了@些嗽]e`外，他在是一相不e的Z料臁Ｎ抑所以X得有必要⑺的e`提出碛，是因檫@些e`以我看恚大部分都是毫o理由的。我不知道CLEC是人工做Tagging是用自踊程式做的，但是似乎K不像是因slgg6985所言，是因W者e`嗽]每人的判x可能不同。有太多的例子，是人X得不知所云的。...

我是台淼摹Ｒ樘尺]有中人的W者Z料欤所以我得知CLEC的存在r相高d。透^各N管道，K於纳虾ＹI到。想用CLEC完成我的T士文，s]想到我文I完成後_始分析Z料，slFCLECe的擞真的e`百出。m然我K]有研究所有的tags，但是就我的研究说亩言，正_率真的大有}。我τ沙淌脚艹淼难芯拷Y果失去信心，只好用人工方式，一字一字的挑e。 @既然是一花了@N多X及人力建立的Z料欤如果e`太多，如何作研究工具呢？

大家好，不好意思，y一下繁w字。

I have searched the database of CLEC and read the concordance lines sorted by Wordsmith. But alas......there are a lot of tagging errors in this corpus. I believe this will affect the validity of the research results, particularly for error analysis. Did anyone notice this serious problem?