S singer 普通会员 2006-04-20 #1 请教问题:今天下午我在用wordsmithtools 3.0检索gotagger标注过的文件时,检索词输入for *_nn,结果显示no entried found.可是如果我输入*_nn for,则显示431个结果,为什么会这样? 明明记得早上就是这样检索的,而且没有问题。请各位老师指点。
请教问题:今天下午我在用wordsmithtools 3.0检索gotagger标注过的文件时,检索词输入for *_nn,结果显示no entried found.可是如果我输入*_nn for,则显示431个结果,为什么会这样? 明明记得早上就是这样检索的,而且没有问题。请各位老师指点。
X xiaoz 永远的超级管理员 Staff member 2006-04-20 #5 回复:[求助]concordancing collocations That's because for also has a POS tag. Try the following pattern: for_* *_nn* 以下是引用 singer 在 2006-4-20 19:32:54 的发言: 请教问题:今天下午我在用wordsmithtools 3.0检索gotagger标注过的文件时,检索词输入for *_nn,结果显示no entried found.可是如果我输入*_nn for,则显示431个结果,为什么会这样? 明明记得早上就是这样检索的,而且没有问题。请各位老师指点。 Click to expand...
回复:[求助]concordancing collocations That's because for also has a POS tag. Try the following pattern: for_* *_nn* 以下是引用 singer 在 2006-4-20 19:32:54 的发言: 请教问题:今天下午我在用wordsmithtools 3.0检索gotagger标注过的文件时,检索词输入for *_nn,结果显示no entried found.可是如果我输入*_nn for,则显示431个结果,为什么会这样? 明明记得早上就是这样检索的,而且没有问题。请各位老师指点。 Click to expand...
xujiajin 管理员 Staff member 2006-04-20 #6 I think Richard is right. But in my experience, sometimes WS fails to produce anything if the search string contains both TAG(s) and WORD(s).
I think Richard is right. But in my experience, sometimes WS fails to produce anything if the search string contains both TAG(s) and WORD(s).