居然在CCL语料库检索系统（网络版）中检索不到“双规”！

[patricx]

今天突然想到“双规”这个词，在CCL语料库检索系统（网络版）中居然检索不到，我去查《现代汉语词典》居然也没有。这个词是新词？我没查到CCL语料库所收的语料目录，看来语料库也应该不断记忆和更新啊！！！

 

[hancunxin]

恩，及时更新是语料库建设的硬伤。

 

[xiaoz]

回复：居然在CCL语料库检索系统（网络版）中检索不到“双规”！

That's what a corpus is for...

 

[oscar3]

也许建立语料库的目的是为了研究那些较为典型的语言现象。

 

[清风出袖]

语言是与时俱进的，语料库也应该是这样，否则语料库就成了一潭死水！

 

[xusun575]

"双规" is a transient political jargon which should be included in a specialised corpus of its kind.

 

[xiaoz]

回复：居然在CCL语料库检索系统（网络版）中检索不到“双规”！

Not exactly. If you want to study English in the 18th century, should your corpora be constantly updated to include present-day English? I think a distinction should still be maintained between SAMPLE CORPORA and MONITOR CORPORA.

以下是引用 清风出袖 在 2005-9-21 13:49:06 的发言：
语言是与时俱进的，语料库也应该是这样，否则语料库就成了一潭死水！

 

[xusun575]

回复：居然在CCL语料库检索系统（网络版）中检索不到“双规”！

以下是引用 清风出袖 在 2005-9-21 13:49:06 的发言：
语言是与时俱进的，语料库也应该是这样，否则语料库就成了一潭死水！

Should there be "保先” in CCL which prevails in the members of CCP?

 

[oscar3]

回复：居然在CCL语料库检索系统（网络版）中检索不到“双规”！

以下是引用 xusun575 在 2005-9-22 0:10:52 的发言：

以下是引用 清风出袖 在 2005-9-21 13:49:06 的发言：
语言是与时俱进的，语料库也应该是这样，否则语料库就成了一潭死水！

Should there be "保先” in CCL which prevails in the members of CCP?

If the corpus was designed for the study of Chinese neologism, it should include the neologisms as soon as possible. If not, it is not fair to say that CCL should include everything. Don't forget that representativeness is one of the charracteristics of a corpus.