(请教)如何界定抄袭

happyJane

初级会员
偶在杂志《外语研究》中发现了一篇文章,完全模仿了《外语教学与研究》中的另一篇文章的写法。模仿了它的框架,研究方法,思路。只不过将研究对象改换了一下。大家说这算抄袭吗?偶都要晕了,这可是核心杂志哎!
 
回复:(请教)如何界定抄袭

给出篇名让大家讨论一下吧。

[本贴已被 作者 于 2006年07月18日 19时00分33秒 编辑过]
 
回复:(请教)如何界定抄袭

yinghuang 为什么把帖子编辑了?原来回复的那个很好,为什么不见了?再发一遍好吗?
 
回复:(请教)如何界定抄袭

我主要是觉得太占空间了,所以那个帖子去掉了。
 
让我们宽容一下吧。难道你们写论文时,就没模仿过别人?我问这个问题,只是想了解一下模仿别人时如何掌握尺度。
 
回复:(请教)如何界定抄袭

Plagiarism: What It is and How to Recognize and Avoid It
http://www.indiana.edu/~wts/pamphlets/plagiarism.shtml


以下是引用 happyJane2006-7-20 0:27:57 的发言:
麻烦yinghuang 再发一遍,我们copy 一下好吗?

[本贴已被 作者 于 2006年07月20日 20时05分01秒 编辑过]
 
回复: (请教)如何界定抄袭

What is regarded as plagiarism in a British university -

First - when you quote the work of others directly it is plagiarism unless you provide a suitable reference, which includes a relevant page number or numbers.

Second - it is not good enough to just change a few words so that it is slightly different from the copied extract (be it a sentence or a few sentences). If you do this, you still need to provide a reference.

Third - if you are talking about someone else's ideas - then you need to signal this by providing a reference. A page number or page numbers is not always required - but the author(s) and year of study are absolute requirements. If they are not given, then it counts as plagiarism.

Fourth - you should avoid copy and pasting bits from an earlier assignment into a later assignment. If you want to do this, then provide a reference that refers to your own earlier work.

Fifth - you should not hand in something that is not your own work (i.e. something that someone else has written for you or that you have copied from).


Finally, from this semester onwards, we will expect you to check your work via "Turnitin". This software programme should be able to flag up all instances where you have "borrowed" from the work of others. As such, you can use it to check that you have, in fact, referenced everything that is highlighted by the "Turnitin" programme. That said, the programme isn't fullproof - i.e. it won't be able to say you need to refer to one of your own pieces of work or class handouts/power-points, etc.
 
Back
顶部