有没有工具能直接计算英语的易读性/可读性readability？Readability Analyzer
- 主题发起人 sunsunny
- 时间
xusun575
高级会员
回复: 请问:有没有工具能直接计算英语的易读性
word中就有. word--工具--拼写与语法,具体见附图.
此外,topicalizer(用google查一下)也有非常好的readability工具.
word中就有. word--工具--拼写与语法,具体见附图.
此外,topicalizer(用google查一下)也有非常好的readability工具.
附件
太感谢了,给我这个菜鸟无限希望,终于找到组织了
回复: 请问:有没有工具能直接计算英语的易读性
Readability Analyzer 1.0(090830修正版)
新版修正了2个bugs
1.vista下无法保存
2.平均句长会受小数点影响
修正时间：2009-8-30
鸣谢：wasx和其他使用Vista系统的网友。
Readme下载
http://www.corpus4u.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=730&d=1250864581
软件下载
http://www.corpus4u.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=769&d=1251645403
Readability Analyzer 1.0(090830修正版)
新版修正了2个bugs
1.vista下无法保存
2.平均句长会受小数点影响
修正时间：2009-8-30
鸣谢：wasx和其他使用Vista系统的网友。
Readme下载
http://www.corpus4u.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=730&d=1250864581
软件下载
http://www.corpus4u.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=769&d=1251645403
回复: 请问:有没有工具能直接计算英语的易读性
ASL = Average Sentence Length
AWL = Average Word Length
Tokens = the total number of all occurences of alphanumeric symbols
Word Types = the total number of distinct words (e.g. 10 instances of ‘do’ are counted as 1 TYPE of ‘do’.)
Lemma Types = the total number of base forms (e.g. ‘do’ is the lemma for do, does, did, doing, done if any).
Lemma/Word ratio, Word TTR (Type Token Ratio), Word STTR (Standardised Type Token Ratio), Lemma TTR and Lemma STTR are all scores for lexical richness. Most often Word STTR is good enough as a lexical richness value. You can use the other scores for your particular research purposes.
ASL = Average Sentence Length
AWL = Average Word Length
Tokens = the total number of all occurences of alphanumeric symbols
Word Types = the total number of distinct words (e.g. 10 instances of ‘do’ are counted as 1 TYPE of ‘do’.)
Lemma Types = the total number of base forms (e.g. ‘do’ is the lemma for do, does, did, doing, done if any).
Lemma/Word ratio, Word TTR (Type Token Ratio), Word STTR (Standardised Type Token Ratio), Lemma TTR and Lemma STTR are all scores for lexical richness. Most often Word STTR is good enough as a lexical richness value. You can use the other scores for your particular research purposes.
回复: 请问:有没有工具能直接计算英语的易读性
good information
good information
回复: 请问:有没有工具能直接计算英语的易读性
用word设置好了以后，到哪里看到易读性啊？
用word设置好了以后，到哪里看到易读性啊？
回复: 请问:有没有工具能直接计算英语的易读性
自己以前文章易读性，是自己数的很晕，数据参差不齐都不敢往下做．在２楼的指点下发现了
http://www.editcentral.com/gwt1/EditCentral.html
其中有Flesch reading ease score，易读度参考量表(Reference table of Readability)也好找．但是数据和许博士分享的Ｒeadability Analyzer中的Reading ease 不太一样，试了三篇，第一篇结果一致，第二篇差了４．１，第三篇差了９．也不知哪有了问题．Ｒeadability Analyzer中的Reading ease 应该就是Flesch reading ease score吧
自己以前文章易读性，是自己数的很晕，数据参差不齐都不敢往下做．在２楼的指点下发现了
http://www.editcentral.com/gwt1/EditCentral.html
其中有Flesch reading ease score，易读度参考量表(Reference table of Readability)也好找．但是数据和许博士分享的Ｒeadability Analyzer中的Reading ease 不太一样，试了三篇，第一篇结果一致，第二篇差了４．１，第三篇差了９．也不知哪有了问题．Ｒeadability Analyzer中的Reading ease 应该就是Flesch reading ease score吧
回复: 请问:有没有工具能直接计算英语的易读性
Ｒeadability Analyzer中的Reading ease 是Flesch reading ease score。
不同网站所用公式是一样的，只是大家对token或者说word的认定不一，导致结果有差别，有时差别很大。如hyphenated words是否算两个词等。
Ｒeadability Analyzer的结果同MS Word里的数值是一致的。
Ｒeadability Analyzer中的Reading ease 是Flesch reading ease score。
不同网站所用公式是一样的，只是大家对token或者说word的认定不一，导致结果有差别，有时差别很大。如hyphenated words是否算两个词等。
Ｒeadability Analyzer的结果同MS Word里的数值是一致的。
清风出袖
高级会员
回复: 请问:有没有工具能直接计算英语的易读性
There are many many many web sites which provide readability scores. In the literature, more than 200 readability formulas have been created (DuBay 2004). The best known readability formulas include the Flesch Reading Ease Formula (1948), the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Formula (1976), the Fry Readability Graph (1977), Dale and Chall’s Formula (1944), the SMOG formula, etc.
*DuBay, W. H. (2004). The Principles of Readability. California: Impact Information.
But most readability score analyzers are web-based.
To make it locally available and txt, doc, and rtf compatible, we developed this Readability Analyzer. Also we added lemma, standadized ttr, and much more information than other readability analyzer.
There are many many many web sites which provide readability scores. In the literature, more than 200 readability formulas have been created (DuBay 2004). The best known readability formulas include the Flesch Reading Ease Formula (1948), the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Formula (1976), the Fry Readability Graph (1977), Dale and Chall’s Formula (1944), the SMOG formula, etc.
*DuBay, W. H. (2004). The Principles of Readability. California: Impact Information.
But most readability score analyzers are web-based.
To make it locally available and txt, doc, and rtf compatible, we developed this Readability Analyzer. Also we added lemma, standadized ttr, and much more information than other readability analyzer.